Hi,
On Fri, 8 May 2026 at 05:46, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 7:12 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Attached patch fixes both issues.
>
> I plan to push and back-patch this shortly, as the code freeze for the
> stable branches is just around the corner.
>
> - Richard
>
>
I reviewed the patch and it looks good to me.
The added opfamily and collation checks seem consistent with the uniqueness
proof used in relation_has_unique_index_for(), and the tests cover both
reported wrong-result cases.
Applied the patch, ran tests, they passed.
Regards,
Ayush