| From: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove the refint contrib module (for v20) |
| Date: | 2026-06-08 19:14:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAJTYsWXoWWyB6JNAqi2Fpv7DgapM5TbHei8G=UsmWgXkSAccbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sat, 6 Jun 2026 at 03:35, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 5 Jun 2026, at 23:05, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 12:57:56AM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
> >> Thoughts? Does this look like the right approach, or is there a
> >> reason to keep refint around?
> >
> > +1. Do we need an appendix-obsolete entry for the docs?
>
> Seems like a reasonable thing to add. Once merged, we should probably add
> (and
> backpatch) a mention to the docs that the functionality will be removed in
> v20.
>
v2 attached. 0001 now adds an appendix-obsolete entry under the same
contrib-spi-refint id, so existing /current/ documentation links keep
resolving (mirrors the auth-radius pattern). 0002 is unchanged.
The back-patched "will be removed in v20" notice on v19 (and older)
I can send it post this merge, as suggested.
Please let me know if I've missed something more. Or if I should
split v2-0001 into 2 parts, one for removal and the other for appendix-
obsolete entry.
Regards,
Ayush
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Remove-the-refint-contrib-module.patch | application/octet-stream | 37.5 KB |
| v2-0002-Handle-refint-removal-in-cross-version-pg_upgrade-te.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joao Foltran | 2026-06-08 19:15:24 | Re: [BUG] [PATCH] Allow physical replication slots to recover from archive after invalidation |
| Previous Message | Marcos Pegoraro | 2026-06-08 19:11:05 | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE statements |