Re: Proposal: INSERT ... BY NAME

From: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: INSERT ... BY NAME
Date: 2026-07-22 11:44:53
Message-ID: CAJTYsWWCefT-uL81VySjMpmhwveKUPFJhGSwoW3NLb8ta8-=uQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 16:07, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> wrote:

>
>
> On 10.07.26 10:06, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> > It is technically not yet in the standard but it was accepted and will
> > almost certainly be there in the next version. I was there as a guest at
> > the meeting when this very question was discussed and that is indeed a
> > feature gap in DuckDB. But as it is a very new feature in the upcoming
> > version of the standard that is to be expected.
>
> Thanks for the info!
>
> I tested this feature in my different scenarios and it seems pretty
> solid. I'll try to get my hands on this spec draft to see if it's
> compliant.
>

Thanks a lot for testing the feature out.

Regards,
Ayush

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Kush 2026-07-22 11:54:17 Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in pg_config
Previous Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-07-22 11:39:33 Re: Proposal: INSERT ... BY NAME