| From: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: to_date()/to_timestamp() silently accept month=0 and day=0 |
| Date: | 2026-04-24 09:13:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAJTYsWVEk5vdy8of2DCWzDNJgHUNL0p0Dt6b1zkgmvmNo3ht6w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 at 13:46, Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 at 13:42, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> > On 24 Apr 2026, at 00:14, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 10:06:41PM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
>> >> If we are not going to change the behaviour, imo, we should
>> >> atleast add a test case to depict this scenario and comment
>> >> that says this is expected behaviour according to the community.
>> >
>> > Yes, we could close the gap with some tests, at least.
>>
>> +1. Do you want to work on this Ayush?
>>
>
> Yes, I'll send a patch with test case today.
>
>
Attached patch, please review.
Regards,
Ayush
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-regression-tests-for-to_date-to_timestamp-zero-m.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2026-04-24 11:56:38 | BUG #19465: Inconsistency in EXP(LN(x)) equivalence leading to different COUNT result in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Oleg Gurev | 2026-04-24 08:38:14 | [BUG] Windows Server 2019 build fail |