Re: [PATCH] refint: Avoid reusing cascade UPDATE plans.

From: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refint: Avoid reusing cascade UPDATE plans.
Date: 2026-05-15 15:04:55
Message-ID: CAJTYsWVDjDWhPK2aoUxjfwh_FP2Q40gJth4LQy7Ruw=1qs-zTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 20:16, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 04:42:45PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2026-May-15, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >> Yeah, this may be the best option. I'm curious what others think.
> >
> > I think this bug makes it clear that this code has few enough users, and
> > a sufficient number of bugs, that we should just nuke it. Do you really
> > want to spend so much time trying to fix it? The module's documentation
> > says
> >
> > (This functionality is long since superseded by the built-in foreign
> > key mechanism, of course, but the module is still useful as an
> example.)
> >
> > but I question whether the usefulness value is really there.
> >
> > Would anyone oppose that?
>
> Big +1 for removing it in v20. Or maybe even v19. I do think it is worth
> trying to fix the more egregious bugs, though, as the code will still be
> supported for a few years.
>
>
I agree on the removal part.

In the meantime, since the module will still be
supported for a while, this seems like a focused fix for the more
egregious cache behavior.

Attached v3 removes the private SPI plan cache from refint entirely.
Both check_primary_key() and check_foreign_key() now prepare their SPI
plans per trigger invocation and let SPI_finish() release them.

Regards,
Ayush

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-refint-Remove-private-SPI-plan-cache.patch application/octet-stream 11.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-05-15 15:13:15 Re: (SQL/PGQ) cache lookup failed for label
Previous Message Junwang Zhao 2026-05-15 15:01:06 Re: (SQL/PGQ) cache lookup failed for label