| From: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Fix duplicate errmsg in ALTER TABLE SPLIT PARTITION |
| Date: | 2026-04-22 08:19:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAJTYsWUzT0xBpJgiCWV2W+gra6_Ck73NhT661OtnOEoZLQixmQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Thanks for taking a look at the patch.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 at 12:59, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 5:37 PM Ayush Tiwari
> <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Reattaching patch with right format for cfbot.
> >
>
> I am not so sure these errhint are redundant, maybe the errdeatil is
> redundant.
> I am ok with:
> + errmsg("cannot merge non-adjacent partitions \"%s\" and \"%s\"",
> second_name->relname, first_name->relname),
> + errhint("ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS requires the partition
> bounds to be adjacent."),
>
I see your point, but I'd lean toward keeping errdetail over errhint
here. The errdetail tells the user *which* specific bounds don't match
("lower bound of partition B is not equal to upper bound of partition
A"), which is useful when merging 3+ partitions — the user can identify
the exact problem pair. The errhint ("bounds must be adjacent") mostly
restates what the errmsg ("non-adjacent") already says.
That said, I don't feel strongly about it. I could also keep both
(errdetail + errhint) if you think that's better, though it does get
verbose. What do you think?
>
> in partition_split.sql, partition_merge.sql,
> I agree with that.sql file has "-- ERROR:" comments that are
> exact copies of the error message, is not great. But you suddenly delete
> all
> these comments seems not good.
>
> We can add the `-- ERROR` comment suffix, as used in
> contrib/file_fdw/sql/file_fdw.sql
> or group them and add a comment like ``-- none of the following should
> be accepted``,
> as seen in src/test/regress/sql/arrays.sql.
>
Good point, removing them all without replacement does make the tests
harder to skim. I'll update v3 to use short markers like "-- should
fail" instead of the exact error text, similar to what file_fdw.sql
does. That way there's still a visual signal that the statement is
expected to error, without the maintenance burden of duplicating the
exact message.
Regards,
Ayush
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-04-22 08:57:32 | Re: pg_test_timing: fix unit typo and widen diff type |
| Previous Message | Arseniy Mukhin | 2026-04-22 08:14:52 | Re: amcheck support for BRIN indexes |