Re: BUG #19520: PANIC when concurrently manipulating stored procedures with pg_stat_statements and track_functions =

From: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, zlh21343(at)163(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #19520: PANIC when concurrently manipulating stored procedures with pg_stat_statements and track_functions =
Date: 2026-06-18 03:22:49
Message-ID: CAJTYsWUhMkAyn-pBAnzRSPjF6ehHwKf=1hFxR=MaRDHPYDmSNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 at 06:33, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

>
> Attaching an updated patch for now. I am still testing it locally
> across all the branches to make sure that the issue is gone (that
> takes quite a bit of time). I'll probably apply it in a few hours
> down to v15 if nothing pops up.
>

The v2 patch looks fine to me. Tested it, no PANICs.

And the assert too looks good to me.

Regards,

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 王跃林 2026-06-18 05:24:05 Re: Fw:Re: Fw: gbt_var_consistent in contrib/btree_gist/btree_utils_var.c has internal-node type confusion on the <> strategy, bypassing exclusion constraints
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-06-18 01:03:40 Re: BUG #19520: PANIC when concurrently manipulating stored procedures with pg_stat_statements and track_functions =