Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:08 AM Anastasia Lubennikova
<a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> On 01.12.2020 03:08, James Coleman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:39 PM Tomas Vondra
> > <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I've pushed the 0001 part, i.e. the main fix. Not sure about the other
> >> parts (comments and moving the code back to postgres_fdw) yet.
> > I noticed the CF entry [1] got moved to the next CF; I'm thinking this
> > entry should be marked as committed since the fix for the initial bug
> > reported on this thread has been pushed. We have the parallel safety
> > issue outstanding, but there's a separate thread and patch for that,
> > so I'll make a new CF entry for that.
> >
> > I can mark it as committed, but I'm not sure how to "undo" (or if
> > that's desirable) the move to the next CF.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > James
> >
> > 1: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/30/2754/
> >
> >
> Oops...
> I must have rushed with this one, thank you for noticing.
> I don't see how to move it back either. I think it's fine to mark it as
> Committed where it is now.
>

BTW, I still see this one as needs review

--
Jaime Casanova
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación