Re: PostgreSQL and Real Application Testing (RAT)

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: ROS Didier <didier(dot)ros(at)edf(dot)fr>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Real Application Testing (RAT)
Date: 2019-08-27 18:42:27
Message-ID: CAJGNTePUxUW9Nq0mX2Cnuju98TMFe2QsH3NYHGSpqYi6NWGVFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 05:47, ROS Didier <didier(dot)ros(at)edf(dot)fr> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
>
> In my business, one of the things blocking the migration from Oracle to
> PostgreSQL is not having the equivalent of Oracle Real Application Testing .
>
> This product captures a charge in production and replay it in a test
> environment.
>
> this allows to know the impacts of a migration to a newer version, the
> creation of an index..
>
> is there an equivalent in the PostgreSQL community?
>

I used https://github.com/laurenz/pgreplay recently to re-execute the
queries sent to a pg9.1 in a pg11. It was very useful to find queries that
are affected but changes in default values of GUCs.

Normally, a query that works in an old version will work in a new one; but
this is useful to catch the few that don't if any

--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-08-27 19:06:15 Missing newline in pg_upgrade usage()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-08-27 18:29:34 Re: block-level incremental backup