Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL
Date: 2015-11-19 16:37:09
Message-ID: CAJGNTeNVBMDzxwi=QaJWbeVequf1oENF9GbFaRMfny9H6ic_Ng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 August 2015 at 20:19, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> But where does this belong? Core? Its own separate extension?
>

I will say core. Gin indexes are in core and i don't see why this
function shouldn't.
FWIW, brin indexes has a similar function brin_summarize_new_values() in core

--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Blackwell 2015-11-19 16:44:27 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-11-19 16:35:40 Re: proposal: LISTEN *