Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum

From: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum
Date: 2026-01-07 20:52:04
Message-ID: CAJDiXgjh5WrZ6tTnNPodKFqGa-Wtx-ZRfmB91KBwRtcjDQkx5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 8:51 PM zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I noticed one thing: autovacuum_max_parallel_workers is initialized to 0 in globals.c,
> but its GUC default (boot_val) is '2' in guc_parameters.dat. While GUC overrides it on startup,
> this mismatch may cause confusion. Perhaps we should modify this to match the approach for max_parallel_workers.
>

Good catch, thank you!
I'll fix it in the next version of the patch.

--
Best regards,
Daniil Davydov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2026-01-07 20:57:56 Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-01-07 20:29:28 Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY