| From: | Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fillfactor effectiveness on existing table |
| Date: | 2026-02-14 00:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAJCZkoLBd1A14rCVW6=xH7mUncxVzyYd8dNgQ+z6d36pOcXdFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi
All updates are HOT as per my observation
With one day bloat I see about 70 gb
Actual size of table is around 10gb only
I see strange behaviour even of completing repack activity for 14 and as
well as for 16 in the log
I think there was an issue at code side
How to fix this
2026-02-14 00:14:31.662
UTC,"offer","offer",674993,"127.0.0.1:28840",698fb1a0.a4cb1,376,"idle",2026-02-13
23:20:00 UTC,67/0,0,ERROR,26000,"unnamed prepared statement does not
exist",,,,,,,,,"e3d","client backend",,2064869707185898531 2026-02-14
00:14:31.792 UTC,"offer","offer",675945,"127.0.0.1:50690",698fb3f8.a5069,482,"ROLLBACK",2026-02-13
23:30:00 UTC,113/111425,3142683,LOG,00000,"temporary file: path
""base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp675945.44"", size
62053892",,,,,,"ROLLBACK",,,"e3d","client backend",,3749380189022910195
2026-02-14 00:14:32.849
UTC,"offer","offer",673259,"127.0.0.1:17360",698facf0.a45eb,842,"ROLLBACK",2026-02-13
23:00:00 UTC,65/168038,3142686,LOG,00000,"temporary file: path
""base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp673259.41"", size
64701020",,,,,,"ROLLBACK",,,"e3d","client backend",,3749380189022910195
2026-02-14 00:14:33.299
UTC,"offer","offer",675945,"127.0.0.1:50690",698fb3f8.a5069,483,"idle",2026-02-13
23:30:00 UTC,113/0,0,ERROR,26000,"unnamed prepared statement does not
exist",,,,,,,,,"e3d","client backend",,2064869707185898531 2026-02-14
00:14:33.299 UTC,"offer","offer",675945,"127.0.0.1:50690",698fb3f8.a5069,484,"idle",2026-02-13
23:30:00 UTC,113/0,0,ERROR,26000,"unnamed prepared statement does not
exist",,,,,,,,,"e3d","client backend",,2064869707185898531 2026-02-14
00:14:34.159 UTC,"offer","offer",674349,"127.0.0.1:61350",698fb074.a4a2d,396,"ROLLBACK",2026-02-13
23:15:00 UTC,49/153459,3142912,LOG,00000,"temporary file: path
""base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp674349.29"", size
44533064",,,,,,"ROLLBACK",,,"e3d","client backend",,3749380189022910195
Regards
Durga Mahesh
On Wed, 11 Feb, 2026, 14:23 Durgamahesh Manne, <maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb, 2026, 12:07 Laurenz Albe, <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2026-02-11 at 07:58 +0530, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > @Laurenz Albe
>> > offer=> SELECT relname AS table_name, n_tup_upd AS updates,
>> n_tup_hot_upd AS hot_updates FROM pg_stat_all_tables WHERE relname =
>> 'market';
>> > table_name | updates | hot_updates
>> > market | 5997455764 | 3752865557
>>
>> Did you read my e-mail?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Laurenz Albe
>>
>
>
> Hi
>
> Yes I have read. Will check get back to you soon. On fly info given
> earlier
>
> Regards
> Durga Mahesh
>
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2026-02-14 02:29:11 | PRIMARY KEY parameters |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2026-02-13 22:23:38 | Re: Best practice for granting folder read/write permission on Windows |