Re: access numeric data in module

From: Ed Behn <ed(at)behn(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: access numeric data in module
Date: 2025-03-01 20:32:47
Message-ID: CAJBL5DNgNF3DZF6oKN12j6Dd-=UhR2nAEK+RxzfQtTdRgvjqoA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom-
I think that I can allay your concerns. Please give me a day or so to
put together my more complete thoughts on the matter. I'll be in touch.

-Ed

On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 11:33 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Ed Behn <ed(at)behn(dot)us> writes:
> >> There is actually no new code. Code is simply moved from numeric.c to
> >> numeric.h.
>
> I will absolutely not hold still for that. It would mean that any
> time we want to think about messing with the contents of numerics,
> we need to examine more or less the whole Postgres code base to see
> what else is poking into those structures.
>
> If we must do something like this, then a separate header
> "numeric_internal.h" or something like that would reduce the blast
> radius for changes. But IMO you still haven't made an acceptable case
> for deciding that these data structures aren't private to numeric.c.
> What behaviors do you actually need that aren't accessible via the
> existing exported functons?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-03-01 20:48:18 Re: Statistics Import and Export
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-03-01 18:56:51 Re: Statistics Import and Export