| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests |
| Date: | 2023-01-31 13:19:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TPrCRxe7AGoL18U_KULVmiUaNPfq+cnFW0odUbSTOSNRw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Peter,
> > What is the status of this patch set? Michael had registered himself as
> > committer and then removed himself again. So I hadn't been paying much
> > attention myself. Was there anything left to discuss?
>
> Previously I marked the patch as RfC. Although it's been a few months
> ago and I don't recall all the details, it should have been in good
> shape (in my personal opinion at least). The commits a9e9a9f and
> 0873b2d Michael referred to are message refactorings so I doubt Jacob
> had serious problems with them.
>
> Of course, I'll take another fresh look and let you know my findings in a bit.
The code is well written, documented and test-covered. All the tests
pass. To my knowledge there are no open questions left. I think the
patch is as good as it will ever get.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-01-31 13:25:55 | Re: Transparent column encryption |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-01-31 13:11:51 | Re: Scan buffercache for a table |