Re: Question on PostgreSQL Table Partitioning – Performance of Queries That Do Not Use the Partition Key

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: atma ram <atmaramkp(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Question on PostgreSQL Table Partitioning – Performance of Queries That Do Not Use the Partition Key
Date: 2025-11-26 13:49:49
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TPai20XksqbwuqTBV5we+qC7P33Ddp8BeKsuZJU32cW7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Atma,

> Question on PostgreSQL Table Partitioning – Performance of Queries That Do Not Use the Partition Key
>
> [...]

pgsql-general@ might be a more appropriate mailing list for your
question. Regarding the question per se, it would be helpful if you
included the exact steps to reproduce the case.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2025-11-26 13:53:17 Re: System views for versions reporting
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-11-26 13:44:00 macOS - Sequoia CI task is stuck on the Postgres Github CI