Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now
Date: 2022-07-18 09:05:50
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TPaLW+RvX+jZ67UOSVKqOO6U1pBn=QnyPwQSuo2iCEeDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi hackers,

> > If someone put a lot of review into a patchset a few months ago, they
> > absolutely deserve credit. But if that entry has been sitting with no
> > feedback this month, why is it useful to keep that Reviewer around?

As I recall, several committers reported before that they use
Reviewers field in the CF application when writing the commit message.
I would argue that this is the reason.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-07-18 09:11:59 Re: PSA: Autoconf has risen from the dead
Previous Message David Geier 2022-07-18 09:00:08 Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions