| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Trigger violates foreign key constraint |
| Date: | 2024-04-18 12:24:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TOe5KfmkhkBi48LqL3otQ_rkn4P=xCt6oVci_rP6+Sukg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > Patch v3 is attached.
>
> I agree with documenting this hazard, but I think it'd be better
> to do so in the "Triggers" chapter. There is no hazard unless
> you are writing user-defined triggers, which is surely far fewer
> people than use foreign keys. So I suggest something like the
> attached.
I don't mind changing the chapter, but I prefer the wording chosen in
v3. The explanation in v4 is somewhat hard to follow IMO.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcel Hofstetter | 2024-04-18 12:57:14 | Re: Solaris tar issues, or other reason why margay fails 010_pg_basebackup? |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2024-04-18 12:07:43 | Re: plenty code is confused about function level static |