Re: reorganize "Shared Memory and LWLocks" section of docs

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: reorganize "Shared Memory and LWLocks" section of docs
Date: 2024-01-13 10:49:08
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TOdT9TyUKwx+DgS=MEi48JiscGxoAjuMczKEU8-jMsDpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thanks for the updated patch.

> > I see what you mean, but I don't think the problem is the word "each." I
> > think the problem is the use of passive voice. What do you think about
> > something like
> >
> > Each backend will execute the registered shmem_startup_hook shortly
> > after it attaches to shared memory.

That's much better, thanks.

I think the patch could use another pair of eyes, ideally from a
native English speaker. But if no one will express any objections for
a while I suggest merging it.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-01-13 11:02:47 Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2024-01-13 10:39:50 Postgres and --config-file option