Re: XLog size reductions: smaller XLRec block header for PG17

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: XLog size reductions: smaller XLRec block header for PG17
Date: 2024-01-22 10:38:23
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TNmRPwb-1+WO2WRWXcUF8cP9XaBweA-A7ms+dk2SJAKDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> I'm seeing that there has been no activity in this thread for nearly 4
> months, I'm planning to close this in the current commitfest unless
> someone is planning to take it forward.

I don't think that closing CF entries purely due to inactivity is a
good practice (neither something we did before) as long as there is
code, it applies, etc. There are a lot of patches and few people
working on them. Inactivity in a given thread doesn't necessarily
indicate lack of interest, more likely lack of resources.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2024-01-22 10:43:45 Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-01-22 10:26:18 Re: Row pattern recognition