| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer" |
| Date: | 2022-10-23 10:40:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TNZrRTzFHO9Vjb5rqjxhMuaNOaGgFrbjYtQyUjk3BEYqw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi hackers,
> I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling
> "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is
> the patch.
After a little more study I found evidence that both spellings can be
acceptable [1]. As a non-native speaker I can't judge whether this is
true or not and which spelling is preferable. I believe we should
unify the spelling though. The reason why I initially thought
"implementOr" is an incorrect spelling is because most spell-checking
tools I personally use indicated so.
[1] https://english.stackexchange.com/a/358111
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-23 13:04:59 | Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer" |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-10-23 10:23:56 | Re: Interesting areas for beginners |