Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE
Date: 2026-09-30 12:31:05
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TMzuR9o81-koFNaA4CoV-P4wVwQNwunj=kBi+XMAo-0cw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

> This looks ready for committer to me.

v3 needed a little rebase. I reviewed the patch and agree that it's correct.

One little nitpick I have is that
`DoomMyselfAndRaiseSerializationFailure` is inconsistent with the
names of other macros. I would use something like
`DoomAndRaiseSerializationFailure` - similar to the existing
`RaiseSerializationFailure`. I didn't change it in the patch because
the committer may have other preferences when it comes to naming.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Doom-the-serializable-transaction-before-raising-.patch text/x-patch 20.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Rachitskiy 2026-09-30 13:25:32 Re: BUG #19732: first_value/last_value/nth_value return NULL with EXCLUDE TIES when the current row is outside its f
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2026-09-30 12:03:21 BUG #19734: NOT IN type resolution differs for outer Vars, producing different query results