Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17
Date: 2025-11-21 11:36:57
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TMb9LxVn6B=isj1-fQJff4rVqtzvvY3gDNKODTo0BTvow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Bruce,

> Actually, another discussion would be why we have src/tools/codelines in
> the git tree at all. I added it in 2005 to use in counting code lines,
> and I thought we could consider it our standard method, but I am not
> sure anyone aside from me even uses it, and it is clear there are
> multiple methods people consider valid. Should we just remove it?

I think we should.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2025-11-21 11:44:26 Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-11-21 11:34:01 Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec