| From: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
| Date: | 2017-11-07 05:40:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ3gD9f+GNO=ZO0Pecg_feh5=EkvG13rE0LBh=7BHi51ws_Hzg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 November 2017 at 00:33, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Also, +1 for Amit Langote's idea of trying to merge
> mt_perleaf_childparent_maps with mt_persubplan_childparent_maps.
Currently I am trying to see if it simplifies things if we do that. We
will be merging these arrays into one, but we are adding a new int[]
array that maps subplans to leaf partitions. Will get back with how it
looks finally.
Robert, Amit , I will get back with your other review comments.
--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-11-07 06:00:06 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
| Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2017-11-07 05:39:06 | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements |