Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 18:11, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Re: Amit Khandekar 2020-03-16 <CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > So, when we see that there are N number of OS/architecture
> > combinations for which PGDG does not provide packages, is it so
> > because we don't have dedicated machines satisfying the minumum
> > requirements like RAM/core/disk ? In other words, is it only a matter
> > of providing such machine and adding it up in the buildfarm members
> > where it passes the regression tests, or there are are some more
> > requirements over and above the machine resource requirements after
> > which PGDG can officially support those OS/architecture combinations ?
>
> The buildfarm machines have nothing to do with the build daemons
> behind apt.postgresql.org or yum.postgresql.org; they are entirely
> different infrastructure.

Ok.

>
> I guess asking the buildfarm operators if they can spare machines as
> build daemons might work, but I haven't had the time to dig into that.
> If you care about a specific architecture, it would be nice if you
> could arrange that.

I just checked; it is possible for me to arrange for an aarch64 VM
with the configuration you mentioned :
> Are you able to provide a build host for arm64? Specs would be
> something like >= 8 cores, 8 GB of RAM, 100 GB disk, root access.