| From: | Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Row Level Security Documentation |
| Date: | 2017-05-12 01:37:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAHz80e7q-DG3vaePr3c8Ucs=Zae9nb4Oup-jx-WBa0PRa8Z6kg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Of course, better thoughts appear immediately after hitting the send button.
This version of the table attempts to stipulate which section of the
process the rule applies to.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the biggest piece missing is something to summarize the giant
> blocks of text.
>
> Attached is a table that has commands and policy types, and a "yes" if it
> applies.
>
> --
> Rod Taylor
>
--
Rod Taylor
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| create_policy.sgml_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-12 01:42:32 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-12 01:32:26 | Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands |