From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?] |
Date: | 2011-10-07 21:30:39 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0yi_c0SiOhHNkTTBseQ15ZOjaehSVkE=RQtxqsKv8p1Qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> wrote:
> My original read of the problem determined (for me personally) that the only
> way one could be in violation of copyright was if the data was incorrect
> (i.e. not factual). It presented an interesting contradiction. The only way
> they could sue is by agreeing that their data is faulty and should not be
> trusted. :-)
>
> The case Merlin refers to below seemed to rule that even faulty information
> is not a concern.
specifically,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_v._Rural
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-10-07 22:07:19 | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2011-10-07 21:20:31 | Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?] |