Re: 9.3 Json & Array's

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adam Jelinek <ajelinek(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Travers <chris(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.3 Json & Array's
Date: 2013-09-24 20:31:18
Message-ID: CAHyXU0yhKhyz92N3K_cXSHjKi=v4-O30ep+ZAwyPppvXcDtjKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Adam Jelinek <ajelinek(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree with the best effort type of conversion, and only being able to
> handle JSON array's that conform to an SQL array. With that said I would
> love to collaborate with you on this, but there is one thing holding me
> back. The current company I work for (an insurance company) says it is a
> conflict of interest so I have to be careful. I can try to help out in
> other ways if possible, and I will double check with our HR.

pro tip: don't ask until you already did the work.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-09-24 20:40:16 Re: pgbench progress report improvements - split 3
Previous Message Adam Jelinek 2013-09-24 20:14:33 Re: 9.3 Json & Array's