Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)
Date: 2012-04-27 20:56:31
Message-ID: CAHyXU0ya-Kbky2jBnSLJ8Mac_-Ez_Oq3vhmgAxixn7b7ymys2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think there is no point at all in having a discussion about this
> unless we can first agree that the overwhelming majority of people who
> have commented on this issue on this list are unhappy with the current
> default behavior.

count me in. the current behavior sucks.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-04-27 21:04:04 Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)
Previous Message Aakash Goel 2012-04-27 20:49:37 Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)