Re: pg 8.3 replication causing corruption

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bob Hatfield <bobhatfield(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg 8.3 replication causing corruption
Date: 2011-10-13 21:20:07
Message-ID: CAHyXU0yBBQyyvF6Vx-9Mci7JkJhtU41Gg4P7LP_RSF=0VBS+UQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Bob Hatfield <bobhatfield(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> have you had any power events?  hard shutdowns, etc? I wonder if the problem is in the clog files, and not the heap itself.
>
> Nothing unusual for as long as I can tell.  Reminder that as long as I
> don't restart the primary's pg process, everything works fine
> (secondary's data is intact).
>
> It's as if stopping/starting the primary causes a shipped wal file to
> be corrupt or contain duplicated data then processed by the secondary.

My money is on clog/visibility related issues. It's a bit of a bear,
but can you pull the xmin/xmax/ctid for the two duplicate records on
the standby and the correspondingly non-duplicated record on the
master? I'm curious if the heap blocks are identical and if the
standby is incorrectly marking a transaction as valid/invalid.

>From there,

We need to:
*) figure out the transaction bits in clog on both systems and look
them up there.
*) also, look for differences in clog generally
*) digest the heap block containing the records to see if they are identical
*) double check hint bits?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2011-10-13 21:45:24 Re: Test for cascade delete in plpgsql
Previous Message Bob Hatfield 2011-10-13 21:14:29 Re: Are file system level differential/incremental backups possible?