Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran(dot)mkrtchyan(at)desy(dot)de>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Date: 2014-09-18 20:32:20
Message-ID: CAHyXU0xSJR=r4savNfMcpzxBh9ZzgMc4aZtD4DxramZiexkYSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran
<tigran(dot)mkrtchyan(at)desy(dot)de> wrote:
>
> 9.3.5:
> 0.035940 END;
>
>
> 9.4beta2:
> 0.957854 END;

time being spent on 'END' is definitely suggesting i/o related issues.
This is making me very skeptical that postgres is the source of the
problem. I also thing synchronous_commit is not set properly on the
new instance (or possibly there is a bug or some such). Can you
verify via:

select * from pg_settings where name = 'synchronous_commit';

on both servers?

What is iowait? For pci-e SSD, these drives don't seem very fast...

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2014-09-18 20:56:36 Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Previous Message Mkrtchyan, Tigran 2014-09-18 19:50:35 Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4