Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API
Date: 2012-07-24 22:32:34
Message-ID: CAHyXU0xQxY08knSQ0eAoyYMrWLmBd2EG6WgPZvf6s=KDHmDWhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> so #2 seems like the lowest common
> denominator (it would permanently preclude #3 and would require #4 to
> introduce two new functions instead of just one). #1 of course would
> bolt on to #2.

oops, got #1 and #2 backwards there.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2012-07-24 23:09:03 Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-07-24 22:29:36 Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API