Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
Date: 2012-01-27 15:47:09
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wSjcc3vZ1__1wuUSmM1jrToMBAUj_5BErHda48oqZaoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Carlo Stonebanks
<stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
> Assuming there was some sort of cost to pl/pgsql, I rewrote a bunch of
> stored functions s in straight SQL. Each stored proc was calling the next,
> so to get the full effect I had to track down all the pl/pgsql stored
> functions and convert them to sql. However, I was surprised to find after
> all of the rewrites, the LANGUAGE sql procs caused the queries to run slower
> than the LANGUAGE plpgsql.

One reason that plpgsql can outperform sql functions is that plpgsql
caches plans. That said, I don't think that's what's happening here.
Did you confirm the performance difference outside of EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
In particular cases EXPLAIN ANALYZE can skew times, either by
injecting time calls or in how it discards results.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-01-27 16:47:36 Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2012-01-27 14:38:53 Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !