| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
| Date: | 2015-07-21 14:58:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0wSb3Bz87_37HEGBWCpp=3y+mwSt1A8xU4Esx-d=DOyMQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 07/21/2015 10:38 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> where we are with this patch? Can I do some for it?
>
>
> I still feel this approach is misguided, and we should be tweaking psql
> and/or libpq instead. I don't feel strongly though, and if some other
> committer wants to pick this up in its current form, I won't object. So this
> patch has reached an impasse, and if no-one else wants to pick this up, I'm
> going to mark this as "Returned with Feedback" and move on.
That's unfortunate. Maybe I'm missing something:
What does a client side implementation offer that a server side
implementation does not offer?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-07-21 15:00:51 | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support |
| Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2015-07-21 14:55:17 | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support |