| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs |
| Date: | 2019-01-30 04:56:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0wFFq0XKtMwRmuueWyjqFhyrAT4SfxoTv1idZ5nN1GwKA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I propose that we implement and document this as
> >> WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZE { ON | OFF } ] ( query )
>
> > I hate to bikeshed here, but I think it's better english using that
> > style of syntax to say,
> > WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZATION { ON | OFF } ] ( query )
>
> Hm. Doesn't really seem to fit with our style for options elsewhere;
> for instance, EXPLAIN's options are things like ANALYZE ON/OFF and
> VERBOSE ON/OFF, not ANALYSIS and VERBOSITY.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Yep...I'll concede the point.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ideriha, Takeshi | 2019-01-30 05:06:30 | RE: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2019-01-30 04:34:00 | Re: jsonpath |