Re: Load TIME fields - proposed performance improvement

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Load TIME fields - proposed performance improvement
Date: 2020-09-22 03:06:15
Message-ID: CAHut+PvzNEaqk5JXhRDmdi3xjNQQUxmQbaTGXTX+gPm7V4j8dA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom.

Thanks for your feedback.

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Still, for the size of the patch I'm envisioning, it'd be well
> worth the trouble.

The OP patch I gave was just a POC to test the effect and to see if
the idea was judged as worthwhile...

I will rewrite/fix it based on your suggestions.

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-09-22 03:23:24 Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2020-09-22 03:03:44 Re: Logical replication from PG v13 and below to PG v14 (devel version) is not working.