| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value. |
| Date: | 2025-12-18 23:21:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PvZvnPXaiab83R95xwu+evtu747n8d=vL+Aqq+doc+GGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 5:11 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 1:08 PM David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Presently it’s the same criteria as for the code - things deemed bug fixes get back-patched; pure enhancements do not.
>
> Well, okay. Bear with me a moment because I need to calibrate to the
> community norms.
>
> Is the consensus that this is not a "bug fix"? Because I know what the
> feature does, but I cannot understand the current paragraph without
> rereading it several times.
>
As OP, do I get a vote?
FWIW, I think that the purpose of documentation is surely to convey
information *clearly* to users.
And, the original text fails the clarity test because it was simply
too hard to understand what it was trying to say without reading it
multiple times.
And, things that fail tests are called "bugs".
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Koval | 2025-12-18 23:27:34 | Re: Assert when executing query on partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-12-18 23:07:53 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |