| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical" |
| Date: | 2025-10-21 23:19:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PvP2kut4mh3jppymooPnozow3T2fEtybERy3u_kbB1a3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:11 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 3:20 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Do you have thoughts about the patch?
>
> I agree with the rationale that Ashutosh states but I don't see a
> strong need to patch the code to make this a 100% invariable rule. (Of
> course, someone else may disagree, which is fine.)
>
In case it makes any difference...
The codebase already follows this rule in 95% of cases. The patch
simply corrects a couple of inconsistencies that appeared to be
accidental oversights.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2025-10-22 00:02:08 | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue |
| Previous Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2025-10-21 23:16:49 | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue |