Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications
Date: 2026-07-20 02:20:46
Message-ID: CAHut+PvCeJ6yDdRu3Qo7-M5fMzZnV1aEDPckW3oLmgY4xPw3HA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

One more v21* review comment...

1.
@@ -6838,6 +6838,24 @@ describePublications(const char *pattern)
if (!addFooterToPublicationDesc(&buf, _("Tables from schemas:"),
true, &cont))
goto error_return;
+
+ if (pset.sversion >= 190000)
+ {
+ /*
+ * Get tables in the EXCEPT clause for this schema
+ * publication.
+ */

The SCHEMA EXCEPT does not exist in PG19, so shouldn't that version
check be 200000?

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-07-20 02:34:29 Re: Why clearing the VM doesn't require registering vm buffer in wal record
Previous Message David Steele 2026-07-20 02:20:22 Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().