| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing list_free in publicationcmds.c:OpenTableList |
| Date: | 2026-07-29 05:07:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PuwTq-JY+0Jg=tDkv14=QKDQpk3nfa+iG56CYhcUJhT4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 2:35 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 11:44 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:30 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> FWIW, I detected a missing `list_free`, which seems to have been
> >>> accidentally left out from commit 923def9.
>
> >> Okay since list_free for both relids and relids_with_rf are there, I
> >> think list_free for 'relids_with_rf' also make sense. So LGTM.
>
> AFAICS, that function is executed at most once per DDL command,
> in a command-lifetime memory context. I think the right fix
> is not to add another list_free but to remove the misleadingly
> useless ones that are there.
>
I added list_free to be consistent with the existing logic.
Removing everything is also a consistent treatment for all lists. Done
as suggested in patch v2.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Remove-unnecessary-list_free.patch | application/octet-stream | 656 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-07-29 05:22:49 | Re: A new C function `get_partition_root`. |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2026-07-29 05:00:00 | Re: nbtree backwards scan test coverage |