Re: Propose a new function - list_is_empty

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Propose a new function - list_is_empty
Date: 2022-08-17 22:19:47
Message-ID: CAHut+PusB491xNvK7Tn=vArmzu8DBm5j+uosFL0x=hAf4A_sJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:14 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > I'd drop the parens in these particular examples because they are
> > inconsistent with the other parts of the same "if" condition.
>
> After going through the patch I removed most but not all of the
> newly-added parens on those grounds. I also found a couple more
> spots that could be converted. Pushed with those changes.
>

Thanks for pushing.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-08-17 22:49:14 Re: shadow variables - pg15 edition
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-08-17 21:56:07 Re: Add support for DEFAULT specification in COPY FROM