Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2026-01-19 07:02:33
Message-ID: CAHut+Puri1uuzOeuvoFxpW-_z0w3s-9yzSaOsJyRkqVBeU=zCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Dilip.

Thanks for the updates.

I checked the v23-0001 and v23-0002, and they LGTM.

I'll revisit at patch 0003 (docs) another time.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-01-19 07:04:14 Re: Simplify code building the LR conflict messages
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-01-19 06:51:28 Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.