| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2021-05-10 05:21:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PuZxXThYL23yxujehKzNT020-+F2rL1zXN8ZodEN=eirg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:31 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 4) Should we change this to "The end LSN of the prepared transaction"
> just to avoid any confusion of it meaning commit/rollback.
> +<varlistentry>
> +<term>Int64</term>
> +<listitem><para>
> + The end LSN of the transaction.
> +</para></listitem>
> +</varlistentry>
>
Can you please provide more details so I can be sure of the context of
this feedback, e.g. there are multiple places that match that patch
fragment provided. So was this suggestion to change all of them ( 'b',
'P', 'K' , 'r' of patch 0001; and also 'p' of patch 0002) ?
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-05-10 05:36:35 | Remove "FROM" in "DELETE FROM" when using tab-completion |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-05-10 05:14:13 | Re: Reducing opr_sanity test's runtime under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS |