Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Date: 2021-04-08 03:04:27
Message-ID: CAHut+PuVe2YEWwhjOd1u8Ee_CEvrFkvYV87LwFdieoz+V+Tm8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > 3.
> > There is inconsistent wording for what seems to be the same condition.
> > e.g.1 The existing documentation [2] says "Xid of the transaction. The
> > XID is sent only when user has requested streaming of in-progress
> > transactions."
> > e.g.2 For a similar case the patch says "Xid of the transaction (only
> > present for streamed transactions)."
> > I think there should be consistent wording used on this page where possible.
> >
>
> I think this is already modified as below in the patch. Is there any
> other place you are referring to?

No. My mistake. Sorry for the false alarm.

------
KInd Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-08 03:12:46 Re: Extensions not dumped when --schema is used
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-08 02:56:37 Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions