Re: Using defines for protocol characters

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date: 2023-08-07 08:41:52
Message-ID: CAHut+PuE-3tc_6m06bwnjftk2KBM728ZSDhuL1_=vRCfEGMZ1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, I wondered if any consideration was given to using an enum instead
of all the #defines.

I guess, your patch would not be much different; you can still have
all the nice names and assign the appropriate values to the enum
values same as now, but using an enum you might also gain
type-checking in the code and also get warnings for the "switch"
statements if there are any cases accidentally omitted.

For example, see typedef enum LogicalRepMsgType [1].

------
[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/eeb4eeea2c525c51767ffeafda0070b946f26ae8/src/include/replication/logicalproto.h#L57C31-L57C31

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Lepikhov 2023-08-07 08:51:52 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-08-07 08:34:43 Fix badly generated entries in wait_event_names.txt