Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-03-22 07:27:18
Message-ID: CAHut+PtqDZpVDC3ff5KLJ_HPdyuu8idoEZBSfXAnFuAGp_bNMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 6:37 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have further updated the patch to implement unique GID on the
> subscriber-side as discussed in the nearby thread [1]. That requires
> some changes in the test. Additionally, I have updated some comments
> and docs. Let me know what do you think about the changes?
>

Hi Amit.

PSA a small collection of feedback patches you can apply on top of the
patch v65-0001 if you decide they are OK.

(There are all I have found after a first pass over all the recent changes).

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v65-0001-Feedback-parse_subscription_options-parens-not-n.patch application/octet-stream 883 bytes
v65-0002-Feedback-apply_handle_prepare-comment-typo.patch application/octet-stream 909 bytes
v65-0003-Feedback-apply_handle_begin_prepare-ineffective-.patch application/octet-stream 859 bytes
v65-0004-Feedback-AllTablesyncsReady-function-simplified.patch application/octet-stream 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-03-22 07:27:59 RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-03-22 06:58:19 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)