Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc?

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc?
Date: 2025-11-09 21:30:47
Message-ID: CAHut+PtkFu_O7DOR0n2pFWuhpTqM6vcrDeuXW6HMuin4tkuwkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 9, 2025 at 1:50 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 02:35:29PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 2:18 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > ...
> > > You are right that we are inconsistent. I think <structname> is the
> > > accepted way to reference table names, and <structfield> for column
> > > names. If you can create a patch to make them consistent, I can apply
> > > it.
> >
> > Thanks for offering to apply the patch. It has been available for a
> > few months now.
>
> My apologies for not getting to this sooner. (Seems I need to review
> all my saved emails for these type of items.) Patch applied to master.
> Nice improvement.
>

Thanks for pushing!

I updated the CF entry -- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6063/#

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2025-11-09 22:13:43 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-11-09 20:13:22 Re: index prefetching