| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc? |
| Date: | 2025-11-09 21:30:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PtkFu_O7DOR0n2pFWuhpTqM6vcrDeuXW6HMuin4tkuwkQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 9, 2025 at 1:50 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 02:35:29PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 2:18 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > ...
> > > You are right that we are inconsistent. I think <structname> is the
> > > accepted way to reference table names, and <structfield> for column
> > > names. If you can create a patch to make them consistent, I can apply
> > > it.
> >
> > Thanks for offering to apply the patch. It has been available for a
> > few months now.
>
> My apologies for not getting to this sooner. (Seems I need to review
> all my saved emails for these type of items.) Patch applied to master.
> Nice improvement.
>
Thanks for pushing!
I updated the CF entry -- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6063/#
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2025-11-09 22:13:43 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-11-09 20:13:22 | Re: index prefetching |