Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc?

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc?
Date: 2025-11-04 03:35:29
Message-ID: CAHut+PtjfuZW-1cKu=uFyrZEUuNZbGQ2x7bC-M4s6Z=xH9Q0iA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 2:18 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
...
> You are right that we are inconsistent. I think <structname> is the
> accepted way to reference table names, and <structfield> for column
> names. If you can create a patch to make them consistent, I can apply
> it.

Thanks for offering to apply the patch. It has been available for a
few months now.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Alger 2025-11-04 03:36:58 [PATCH] Add pretty formatting to pg_get_triggerdef
Previous Message Peter Smith 2025-11-04 02:44:18 Re: CREATE/ALTER PUBLICATION improvements for syntax synopsis