| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2026-01-20 21:20:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PteQmk6w=AV9qbnYaRZf5bo1jeTW0=XMjFUpWH0+UyZqw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 5:29 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Some review comments for v23-0003 (docs).
>
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
>
> 1. GENERAL.
>
> Mentioning those specific enum values of coflict_log_dest every time
> seemed overkill. In most cases you do really need to mention 'all' or
> 'log' ot 'table'. IMO the user should use the link to the
> 'conflict_log_destination' parameter to see that level of detail.
>
Oops. In my post above I wrote " In most cases you do really need to
mention...". That was a typo which was opposite of what I intended --
I meant " In most cases you do NOT really need to mention...".
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lukas Fittl | 2026-01-20 21:27:05 | Re: pg_stat_statements: Fix nested tracking for implicitly closed cursors |
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-01-20 21:13:53 | Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?) |