From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2022-07-06 23:29:13 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PtBFWVkCoYepMzVUSYzsc_xLJFRvXdZ0baoSyD+kAPGKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:59 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > > Initially, that chapter did not document any system views.
> >
> > Maybe we could make the system views a separate chapter?
>
> +1
There has not been any activity on this thread for a while, so I am
just wondering what I should do next about it:
Are there any other opinions about this?
If there is no interest whatsoever in splitting the existing "System
Catalogs" into 2 chapters ("System Catalogs" and "System Views") then
I will abandon the idea.
But if others also feel it might be better to split them, I can put
patching this on my TODO list and share it sometime later.
TIA.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-07-06 23:53:01 | defGetBoolean - Fix comment |
Previous Message | Steve Chavez | 2022-07-06 23:15:45 | Fwd: Add red-black tree missing comparison searches |