| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_createsubscriber --dry-run logging concerns |
| Date: | 2026-06-29 20:21:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PsyOcRAaFh5o0CWyFWLfrAaeVji=OKGjKO2RjH1P+qaiw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 8:15 AM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026, at 10:56 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > I have a follow-up for this. Earlier in this thread it was asked to
> > combine the dry-run info message into one string with a newline. But I
> > think this doesn't really fit the message style guidelines. I suggest
> > to use a primary plus detail style here too. How about the attached patch?
> >
>
> LGTM.
>
Ditto.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-06-29 20:22:06 | Re: PostgreSQL select-only CTE removal is too aggressive? |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2026-06-29 20:14:41 | Re: pg_createsubscriber --dry-run logging concerns |